On Wednesday, the Harvard Business Review posted a video interview with Brigham Young University (BYU) Professor Jeff Dyer about learnings from his upcoming book, The Innovator’s DNA. In the video, Dyer discusses the ways people innovate. He and his co-authors, Clayton Christensen, of Harvard Business School, and Hal Gregerson, of INSEAD, found five “discovery skills” innovators use to develop their ideas:
- Questioning
- Observing
- Networking
- Experimenting
- Associating
The first four techniques, Dyer said, trigger associational thinking, the cognitive skills that people need to connect things together in order to innovate.
“Those behaviors,” he said, “if mastered, can help anyone to improve their creativity and their ability to be innovative.”
Dyer then offered some great suggestions to help people expand their thinking, or that of their teams.
But a comment from a reader posted below the video got me thinking. This reader, called “Reeree,” said:
“I wonder if this is a skill that can be learned. The idea that it is part of DNA kind of suggest (sic) that it can’t. How a person processes and perceives things does not happen in some step by step process. It’s an embrosia (sic) of processes happening at light speed producing thoughts as a byproduct. Not everyone’s DNA has the same program running the same way. Look at the mind of Michael Angelo, do you think anyone can train to produce a quality of work like his? We need to just respect people for their gifts and not emulate them. At the same time, we should appreciate our individual gifts and all the gifts others bring to the table.”
I think Reeree brings up an interesting point: The title of Dyer’s book suggests that innovation capacity is inherent, yet his interview suggests it can be learned. And, praise for the book on its website indicates this acts as a “how to” manual for innovative thinking.
What I think Dyer is saying that, perhaps, wasn’t clear in his interview, is that the most innovative people naturally practice all these skills more than their less creative counterparts. But, that doesn’t mean that innovation can’t be taught. In fact, I believe it can absolutely be taught. With the right tools and exercises, people can learn to think in different ways.
As Dyer said in a BYU news release, “contrary to conventional wisdom, innovation isn’t a genetic endowment magically given to some and not others; it’s a set of skills that can be developed with practice.”
We can all practice the skills that the experts possess. By doing so, we can all become better innovators.
The Innovator’s DNA comes out July 19. I look forward to reading it and applying the lessons to my thinking.
Do you agree? Is innovation entirely inherent, or can it be learned?
– Kathie
